Thursday, June 18, 2009

NV Lanson Black Label Brut


A bargain champagne. Pale straw and a persistent bead. Bought it for $42. Better than Australian sparkling wines at this (very cheap) price. Medium level of acidity.

Looked like a slightly old bottle, and perhaps starting to look a bit tired. Must try to hunt down a newer one to compare.

[Update: found a newer bottle, confirming my suspisions. It has a new label design with the red Lanson cross at the top of the main label (see above). A better wine - 94/100]

Score: 93/100

Why you want this wine: It is classic champagne, and can be bought quite cheaply - Enjoy the benefits of Champagne.




Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Comparator: Brown Brothers NV sparkling wine. Methode Traditionalle

This wine was assessed straight after drinking the 1996 Pol Roger. At only $20, it has been considered one of the better Australian sparkling wines at that price point. So how does it compare?

The mousse on the wine is not the slightest bit persistent nor lingering, nor is the bead. Shameful for a wine bottled at least 10 years after the Pol Roger. The bouquet is garage like, or a weak acetone. There is also rancid meat. There is little acid, but a flabby, unsophisticated base wine. A real disappointment for a wine that has had some acclamation.

Granted, I tasted this straight after the Pol Roger. Had I had it on its own, I may have been happier with it. But why bother. Wherever they picked the grapes for this wine in Victoria, it wasn't cold enough. I'm not sure why anyone would attempt to make an Australian sparkling white wine anywhere other than Tasmania, or perhaps the very coldest parts of Victoria.

I am happy to view this as a $20 wine, and thus expectations ought be moderated. The problem is that I purchased a few bottles of the woolworths "reserve NV Chardonnay Pinot Noir ML25" cleanskin sparkling wine. I think that that was a better wine, and only $8 a bottle.

I believe that a good sparkling needs under-ripe fruit, and that any sparkling not coming from Tasmania doesn't stand a chance. It is an ultra-cool climate proposition. You add CO2 to an under-ripe base to perfect it.

Score: 88/100

Why you want this wine: You don't. Buy a tasmanian sparkling instead. Go the Bay of Fires, or their second label 'Tigress'. Or go the woolworths cleanskin.

1996 Pol Roger Brut


Pol Roger was Winston Churchill's favourite champagne. As either a tribute to the great man, or a brilliant marketing exercise, Pol Roger have since named their premier wine "the Winston Churchill". Pol Roger is also by appointment to H.M. Queen Elizabeth II, and it's served at royal functions. That 2 of the 3 most powerful British people in the last 100 years have preferred Pol Roger is high praise indeed. I'm not sure what the other one (Tony Blair) drinks, but one would assume that he is a Moët & Chandon slut.

In its NV incarnation, Pol Roger prices on par with the fashion label champagnes of Moët & Chandon and Veuve Cliquot. Those also both have proud histories. You can buy a book at Borders called "the Widow Cliquot" (widow in french is Veuve) that will tell you how Mrs Cliqout, widowed in 1805, built one of the worlds largest Champagne houses. She is also credited with the invention of the riddling rack, allowing for the commercialisation of sparkling wine by making the degorgement process more efficient.

Both Moët & Chandon and Veuve Cliquot, probably the two most recognised brands of Champagne, are now owned by a fashion conglomerate, LVMH - Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton. Huge amounts are spent on marketing, and the quality must suffer as a result. The profits from the above mentioned book probably go to LVMH, as its cover is a near facsimile of the Veuve Cliquot label, and I would imagine that they take those profits. I would be surprised if they subsidised the quality of the wine.

You will be happy to hear that Pol Roger is still owned and run by the descendants of Pol Roger the man.

Which bring us to our present wine, the 1996 Pol Roger Brut, in all its historical glory. The 1996 vintage is regarded as one of the best in Champagne in the last 100 years, perhaps the best ever. At this stage in its development the wine has a light to medium golden hue. A strong line of acid runs through the wine, and granny-smith apples predominate on the palate. A rich and smoothly complex wine, it is consolidating nicely. It has a bouquet of rare book, or pleasant old house (or perhaps even wads of paper-based [not polymer] currency). I think I may even have smelt a tinge of illicit hemp - sheer brilliance.

Score: 96/100

Why you want this wine: Because it's good, no, great. And it isn't a fashion statement.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

NV Balnaves Sparkling Cabernet


A complex wine, blended from 8 vintages of reserve wines.

When I tasted this wine, I liked it. Was quite pissed though.

Score: 89-90/100

Why you want this wine: Interesting in that it is a Cabernet based sparkling wine. Better than some of the cheaper sparkling shiraz options.





Coonawarra road trip: 2005 Mildara Cabernet Shiraz

A blend of cabernet and shiraz from the great 2005 vintage, this wine exceeded expectations. Listed for $25 at cellar-door, and I would have been happy to pay that

It was half price on a 12 bottle purchase, so I managed to get a dozen for $150. It was probably the best value case purchase ever encountered.

A $12.50 bottle of wine in any other circumstance would likely be horrible and industrial.

Price: $25, though $12.50 in a 12-pack purchase.

Rating: 93/100

Why you want this wine: You might not, but at half price for the 12-pack purchase, it may well be the best value wine you have ever bought.

Coonawarra road trip: 2005 Katnook Estate Chardonnay


2005 Katnook Estate Chardonnay:

Prior to the roadtrip, I don't think I had ever drank a white wine from Coonawarra. Superb structure, flavours of stone fruits, and delicious oak (french).

At $28, this wine is not very expensive, indeed great value compared to Margaret River, Yarra Valley and Mornington wines of similar quality.

Score: 92/100
Drink: 2012
Price: $28

Why you want this wine: It's a full bodied white.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Restaurant Review: Gigibaba

102 Smith Street, Collingwood.

This restaurant is in the mould of a turkish Movida, but still quite different. The room is less polished, the food is more rustic. One does not feel the same sense of occasion sitting in Gigibaba as one does in Movida, but it's equally enjoyable

No reservations are accepted, and it opens at 6. At 5:40 I was standing in a short line, for a small room. By 6pm the line was long. I wonder what time the first ones in the queue got there.

We were seated at the bar (where most people will have to sit). My girlfriend was of the opinion, that she was sitting next to Nick Cave. And she knows her music, I would be surprised if she was incorrect.

A turkish beer, efes, was well recieved. The menu listed a number of entree and main options, as well as a chef's banquet for $55. We chose the banquet.

During the first hour, around 10 cold vegetable dishes were brough out, each delicious, especially the silverbeet. There were also dips (hoummus spiked with tahini, a smokey eggplant babaganoush, and a delicious tomato based dip. And we were also granted and oyster each to begin (dressed with tomato and pomegranite).

My usual expectation is that when I start to get full, the banquet is nearing its end. And I was starting to get full after the vegetable dishes. Next were Kofte, the finest example I've had, and cheftalye (as translated by my Greek Cypriot girlfriend), also the finest example.

At that point I was getting very full, and was glad when a waitress delivered prawns in a claypot, and a pidgeon pastry, and told us that that we were "done".

But we weren't.

A main size barbequed chicken arived, a leg and a breast, and it was delicious. At this point I was very full, and assumed the dinner to be over - but again I was wrong.

Next up were Lamb cutlets, expertly seasoned an perfectly cooked, with a blast of oregano. Again I assumed we were finished, but 2 hot vegetable dishes arrived, as well as a salad, and I think a couple more meat dishes that I can't remember. And again we were told that we were done.

Desert, however, arrived in the form of middle eastern pastries. Bakalva, a birds nest, and a middle eastern quince tart.

All delicious, and I was ready to explode from the quantity of food eaten.

As noted, an efes pilsner (from turkey) was drank first, and it exceeded expectation. My girlfriend had a virgin mary, that she proclaimed as the best she has had (and she is an expert on virgin marys - it is her drink of choice). I followed the pilsner with a pinot noir from Domaine A's second label (92), and then a peppery Rhone valley syrah(93). A spanish cava (95) followed as a pallate cleanser, and then a bortrytis infected sauternes (91) to match with dessert.

Overall, a great dining experience. Traditional and rustic, but cooked with creative eye, and expertly seasoned and spiced.

The price was also good - $162.50 before tip, with one heavy drinker (as above).

This establishment will not replace fine dining, nor Movida and the like. It is however a better option than Abla's, but similar in idea (at least as far as food is concerned). It is most likely a cross between Abla's and Movida however. The wine options also make it a better option, as Abla's is strictly BYO. And this venue takes a creative approach to wine service. All drinks are properly measured, and you have the choice of a 120ml, 300ml, or of full bottle serving.

A brilliant restaurant, would not be surprised if it got at least a hat in the next Good Food Guide.

Definately Melbourne's best Turkish restaurant (15/20).